The final version has now been imported here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/npanday/
Cheers, Brett On 06/09/2010, at 3:16 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > You can review the imported contents here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/gmcdonald/npanday/incubator/npanday/ > > This is up to r60216 at codeplex. The final revisions will be added later > today. > > Please take a look over the contents and provide comments today so we can do > the official import tomorrow and move forward! > > Cheers, > Brett > > On 31/08/2010, at 12:24 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > >> Great Job Brett! Way to go on persevering with the svn on codeplex. Let us >> know how we can help with the transfer. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Joe Ocaba >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Brett Porter" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:17:23 AM >> Subject: Re: Code import >> >> I'm making progress here slowly. It will be ready this week, hopefully by >> the time accounts are created to be able to commit. >> >> After a few different attempts I found rsvndump to be the most reliable >> alternative for getting all of the SVN data out of Codeplex. I made some >> modifications to it to work a bit faster and avoid some timeouts retrieving >> logs, etc. However, it's still choking on operations on the /tags/ >> directory. You may be aware that we had problems copying into the tags >> directory due to these issues and had to move to /releases/. I did some >> auditing of this and have removed several failed release attempts and >> branches that were ultimately deleted and not used for anything, then >> recreated release tags properly instead of dumping it (using the original >> author and timestamp). So it's not all the history, but it is all of the >> relevant history and will actually make it easier to trace the changes back. >> >> In addition to this, I've extracted the history for the application of a >> number of patches that was done in the lead up to starting the codeplex >> project, so there'll be some additional history available linking back to >> the fork from the NMaven podling. >> >> Let me know if you have any questions or comments! >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >> >> On 19/08/2010, at 11:44 AM, Liit Padilla wrote: >> >>> + 1 on option 3 >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> liit >>> >>> On 8/19/2010 9:39 AM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: >>>> I'm +1 on starting from the NMaven branchpoint and applying the patches. >>>> We could use really use those histories. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Lars Corneliussen"<[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 2:18:56 AM >>>> Subject: Re: Code import >>>> >>>> Sometimes I missed the history from NMaven. So option three would be >>>> great, if you ask me. >>>> >>>> And yes I have a working git clone. I First fetched the oldest revision >>>> explicitely and then did the svn rebase. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Message sent from mobile device >>>> >>>> Am 17.08.2010 um 14:02 schrieb Brett Porter<[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>> >>>>> I've made a few attempts at how we might import the code from Codeplex a >>>>> while back. It's quite difficult due to the svnbridge that doesn't >>>>> support most of the mirroring without difficulties (svnsync, git-svn, >>>>> hg). The most workable solution to keep history intact seems to be >>>>> recreating the individual commits (with svn:author, svn:date and svn:log >>>>> values), which is something "tfs2svn" tries to do. That's been working >>>>> ok, but I didn't get the whole way through. I think Lars managed a git >>>>> clone somehow that might be a helpful basis too? >>>>> >>>>> There's 3 alternatives: >>>>> - direct import of latest code, leaving history behind >>>>> - take the codeplex revs across as a new import into the svn repository >>>>> (maintain history as it was at codeplex) >>>>> - start from the previous nmaven branchpoint in the incubator and apply >>>>> the changes on top of it up until today (full history since where it >>>>> forked from). I have the revision details to achieve this if wanted. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? How much history do we want to keep? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Brett >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Brett Porter >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [email protected] >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> >> > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
