Let me understand if I got this right... For the release we need a repo obviously - and since we are already using Archiva, it has specific NPanday support, and I'm willing to do the work - we're trying that. If we have any problems we could try the Nexus install instead. Lars, and others that preferred Nexus - are you ok with that, or do you specifically want to use Nexus on repository.apache.org for some other reason?
For the CI, we should do that but it's separate from the release. We have a Windows box running Continuum now but it's better to use the Apache infrastructure. Since there are already Hudson windows slaves and a lot of people liked that option we're trying that. We'll probably need them to install the Windows SDK for testing, so someone will need to volunteer to help with that. If we get stuck we could investigate Continuum, but again we'd need to do the work to set up the agents & VMs. Is that right? Any objections? - Brett On 18/01/2011, at 2:31 PM, Adelita Padilla wrote: > > Wrapping things up, we have the ff results: > > > * Repository - ARCHIVA > > * CI - CONTINUUM/HUDSON > > > Please refer to the new thread: [NPanday] TO DO List before Release, for a > more updated status of the upcoming release. > > > Thanks! > > > ----- "Josimpson Ocaba" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 on Continuum and Archiva >> >> -- >> Joe Ocaba >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Lars Corneliussen" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:15:01 AM >> Subject: Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem >> >> Am 17.01.11 04:34, schrieb Adelita Padilla: >> >> Nexus/Hudson >> or >> Nexus/Teamcity >>> >>> As of today, we have 3 votes: >>> >>> * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) >>> * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) >>> * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) >>> >>> >>> Any thoughts or more suggestions? >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> ----- "Adelita Padilla"<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we >> >>>> going to use? >>>> >>>> I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -- >>>> >>>> liit >>>> ----- Brett Porter<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org >> >>>>>> We currently use archiva& continuum on repo.npanday.org >>>>>> >>>>>> Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; >>>>> I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for >>>> Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to >> >>>> sort out synchronising it to Central. >>>>>> should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or >>>> buildbot? >>>>> Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, >> it >>>> might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since >> >>>> they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here >> and >>>> did a lot of buildbot work. >>>>> - Brett >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Brett Porter >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> liit > > > -- > > liit -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
