I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" to be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - it should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course.
Cos On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote: > I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there. > The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now. > > Last issue to resolve would be > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599 > > Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think if > that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402. > > -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43 > An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ?? > > Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin. > > I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the > non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or > bumped. > > Do any others have a moment to look through them? > > Thanks, > Brett > > On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Ladies and gentlemen. > > > > I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4 > > tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing > > between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is > also an improvement. > > > > Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS > > > > I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers > > and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get > > the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it > > also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors? > > > > What do you guys think? > > Cos > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
