Guys, are we getting anywhere closer to the 1.5.0 release? It seems to be a chunk of activity wrt preparation to it, which then stopped at some point.
Can I help anyhow? Regards, Cos On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:53PM, Brett Porter wrote: > I closed out or moved everything on the 1.5.0-incubating list last Friday - > only thing I wanted to do next was take a pass over the getting started > documentation and check that it is correct and easy to use. > > Does anyone have some cycles to do the same? It might be particularly > helpful to get fresh eyes from a non-committer, and contributions to the > documentation would be most welcome. > > - Brett > > On 24 Aug 2014, at 9:17 am, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I don't see why not. If the current state of the software is "good enough" > > to > > be released from the community standpoint - I'd go for it. But as always - > > it > > should be the PPMC, developers, and users call, of course. > > > > Cos > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:50AM, Lars Corneliussen // Zen wrote: > >> I think we should "just release" it as it is and take it from there. > >> The snapshot-version has been in use for quite a while now. > >> > >> Last issue to resolve would be > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-599 > >> > >> Brett, you talked about somehow caching the resolver per project. I think > >> if > >> that's done we're fine and can close 599 and thus 402. > >> > >> -----UrsprЭngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] Im Auftrag von Brett Porter > >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 02:43 > >> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Betreff: Re: Release 1.5.0 ?? > >> > >> Thanks for the review and the nudge here Konstantin. > >> > >> I've just dropped a couple out, and will take a quick pass over the > >> non-blockers and ones assigned to me to see what else can be closed or > >> bumped. > >> > >> Do any others have a moment to look through them? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Brett > >> > >> On 19 Aug 2014, at 7:37 am, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Ladies and gentlemen. > >>> > >>> I've pocked around a little bit and it seems that there are only 4 > >>> tickets (of which only 2 are real blockers) are effectively standing > >>> between today and the next release of the project. One of the critical is > >> also an improvement. > >>> > >>> Here's what I am referring to http://is.gd/WzgibS > >>> > >>> I am thinking if this would be a sane idea to deal with the blockers > >>> and push Major bugs into 1.6-incubating? This tactic will help to get > >>> the release out so the users have something new to work with. And it > >>> also will provide a new development baseline for the contributors? > >>> > >>> What do you guys think? > >>> Cos > >>> > >> > >> >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
