Also, I presume the report won't happen this time around as noone has answered my email from a few days ago.
Cos On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:54PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Guys, I'm afraid with such a low level of response to the > idea of 1.5.0 release we'd have to proceed under the > assumption that there are no community cycles available > to make it happen within couple of weeks. > > Fair? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > So, any thoughts about the 1.5.0 release? Any volunteers to step up as the > > release manager? > > > > Happy holidays everyone. > > Cos > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:25AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> There was a number of discussions to get 1.5 out of the doors in the last > >> few > >> months. And I think it even got to the point where it was literally almost > >> ready for it. But then Brett had to take care about other things and the > >> momentum was gone again. > >> > >> If there's a champion that can do the release, I as a mentor will be happy > >> to > >> help with it from the IPMC standpoint. And even if later we'll decide that > >> no > >> more releases are needed - as it might have matured enough or for another > >> reason - it will at least have a logical end-point of its life-cycle. > >> > >> So, shall we release it in the next say 2 weeks? > >> Cos > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:00PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> > If you guys think that the state of the code based is such > >> > that you can do a release I can most likely help get you > >> > 3 IPMC members to vote on it. > >> > > >> > Then we can do one final release and retire the poddling. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Roman. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:21 AM, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> > >> > wrote: > >> > > How. I'll do it if no one else does! > >> > > > >> > > Might even clone the code and release it myself anyways. > >> > > > >> > > On Monday, 15 December 2014, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Yes please release 1.5 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Monday, 15 December 2014, Lars Corneliussen // Zen > >> > >> <m...@lcorneliussen.de > >> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@lcorneliussen.de');>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hi Roman, > >> > >>> > >> > >>> even though it "hurts" I think retiring the project is the right > >> > >>> thing to > >> > >>> do. > >> > >>> Not because of the quality of NPanday, but just because the > >> > >>> (developer!) > >> > >>> community is effectively gone. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> While I'm still using NPanday every day (1.5 snapshot), it is all on > >> > >>> the > >> > >>> same project and there is no need for further development currently. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> And just the fact that we haven't been able to release 1.5 for ages > >> > >>> shows > >> > >>> the lack of a functioning community. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> I might invest in releasing 1.5 - but I might also keep saying this > >> > >>> the > >> > >>> years to come. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Although for releasing 1.5 we wouldn't need more than somebody just > >> > >>> doing > >> > >>> the release with how 1.5 is now. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.5.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/developers/releasing.html > >> > >>> > >> > >>> So if someone volunteers - just go ahead. > >> > >>> _ > >> > >>> Lars > >> > >>> > >> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > >>> Von: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag > >> > >>> von > >> > >>> Roman Shaposhnik > >> > >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2014 19:29 > >> > >>> An: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> > >>> Cc: npanday-us...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >>> Betreff: Re: Determining next steps for the NPanday > >> > >>> > >> > >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:08 AM, David Akehurst <d...@akehurst.net> > >> > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> > I would like it to stay > >> > >>> > I have done some development for it > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Please note that retirement doesn't make source code go away -- it > >> > >>> will > >> > >>> still be available for you to use and hack on. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Retirement is ASF's way of telling outside world that even though > >> > >>> source > >> > >>> is still there and available, the community is gone. Now, as I said, > >> > >>> the > >> > >>> measure of the community "being there" could be interpreted as *at > >> > >>> the very > >> > >>> least* having 3 active participants since all decisions would > >> > >>> require 3 > >> > >>> votes minimum. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Not sure if NPanday has that, but would love to be contradicted. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Thanks, > >> > >>> Roman. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> P.S. Finally, should 3 active participants show up after the > >> > >>> retirement, > >> > >>> reviving the project takes very little time. > >> > >>> Hence its not like a permanent state of things. > >> > >>> > >> > >>>
