Are you sure you are configuring your node with the correct call ie using
the new Phy/WirelessPhy?
Also how are you arriving at the Pt_ values, using threshold.exe?
-Sita


> Well the problem I am having at the momment is that I can set different
> nodes with different Pt_ values and different RXThresh values. Even when I
> check those values with the recpective nodes, they give me the values that
> I have set. But when I run the simulation, The first CSThresh value is set
> for all the nodes. so if the first node should only,have 40m range and the
> second a 100m range, bot the nodes are set for 40m range
>
>> Can u please clarify ur question.
>> I am not sure if it is working, but I want to make some nodes more
>> powerful than the rest.
>> But the threshold value for the range is not receiving any packets.
>> -Sita
>>
>>
>>> Hi Sita
>>>
>>> Can you manage to set different ranges for different nodes
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Qasim
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I am trying to simulate a network where the interrow spacing is 19m
>>>> and
>>>> intercolumn spacing is 24m. I have the node's sensing range as 15m.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at some old mail in this mailing list:
>>>>
>>>> It depends on what carrier-sensing range do you want. If you use the
>>>> default values, your carrier-sense range will be about twice the
>>>> receiving
>>>> range. If you would like to see the effects of hidden nodes in your
>>>> simulation, you should set carrier-sensing range same as the receiving
>>>> range. So, if you want to set receiving range 'd_1' and carrier
>>>> sensing
>>>> range 'd_2' (you must have d_2>d_1), then threshold.cc with 'd_1'
>>>> provides
>>>> you the RXThresh_ and the same program with input parameter 'd_2' will
>>>> give you CSThresh_.
>>>>
>>>> I generated RxThresh_ using the threshold program and varied it as
>>>> mentioned above. The source generates packets but it is not picked up
>>>> by
>>>> any other node. why?
>>>> Also, changing Pt_ alone to control transmission range - is that
>>>> acceptable?
>>>> Any suggestions welcome.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sita
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply via email to