The patch is supposed to "work on a non-modified ns-allinone-2.29 in
Fedora Core 5 (with gcc 4.1.0)".

Can Anyone else confirm it, suppose you have installed X development 
libraries?

Regards,
Qihe

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Ali Hamidian wrote:

> Dear Qihe,
>
> I did exactly as you describe below when I got the error message. To be sure, 
> I did it one more time just now with the same result:
>
> ...
> /home/alexh/ns-2/ns-allinone-2.29/tk8.4.11/unix/../generic/tk3d.c:334: 
> warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> make: *** [tk3d.o] Error 1
> tk8.4.11 make failed! Exiting ...
> For problems with Tcl/Tk see http://www.scriptics.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns-allinone-2.29]$
>
>
> So it seems the patch doesn't work on a non-modified ns-allinone-2.29 in 
> Fedora Core 5 (with gcc 4.1.0).
>
> Any comments anyone?
>
> Kind regards
> Ali
>
> Qihe Wang wrote:
>
>> Ali,
>> 
>> The steps to apply the patch:
>> 
>> 1. get a fresh ns-allinone-2.29.2.tar.gz from sf.net.
>> 2. wget http://www.ececs.uc.edu/~cdmc/ucbt/src/ns2292-gcc410.patch
>> 3. tar zxvf ns-allinone-2.29.2.tar.gz
>> 4. patch -p0 < s2292-gcc410.patch
>> 5. cd ns-allinone-2.29
>> 6. ./install
>> 
>> I don't have time to look at your problem.  A common problem I saw on the 
>> mailing list is that the libraries for X development is not installed.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Qihe
>> 
>> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ali Hamidian wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Qihe,
>>> 
>>> I used your patch on an original (not modified) ns-allinone-2.29. Then I 
>>> ran ./install. The compilation went pretty far (although it couldn't 
>>> install xgraph and other optional packages) but stopped when it came to 
>>> building Tk 8.4.11. You can find the error message in the attached file. 
>>> My goal is to install ns-2 (any version, but especially ns-2.26 and 
>>> ns-2.29) in Fedora Core 5, which comes with gcc 4.1.0.
>>> 
>>> Should I do something before applying your patch to the ns-allinone-2.29 
>>> directory (like upgrading Tcl/Tk from version 8.4.11 to version 8.4.13)?
>>> 
>>> Kind regards
>>> Ali
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to