Yeah Renata, Newreno modifies Reno in the Fast Recovery phase to perform better in the context of multiple packet losses in the same window. But my question was different : why does the FullTcp variant of Newreno (TCP/FullTcp/Newreno) perform differently than the normal Newreno (TCP/Newreno) ?
-Sid On 6/16/06, Renata Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't read the RFC yeat, but is there some modification in newreno? ( > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3782.txt) Is there any comments in .cc header > files? > There are a lot of working groups about congestion and avoidance... there > is some difference about it in one of them (look for DCCP). > > Regards, Renata > > > On 6/16/06, Siddharth Ramesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > I was using FullTcp/Newreno agent and found that it behaved differently > > from > > the normal TCP/Newreno in terms of congestion control. I am really not > > sure > > about what is causing the difference. This difference is especially > > obvious > > when the number of flows sharing a bottleneck link becomes high - the > > FullTcp flows were performing much better in terms of the throughputs > > achieved. > > > > Anybody has any clue as to why this is happening? > > Thanks, > > Sid > > > > > > -- > Renata Vidal > "Triste é o destino de quem tenta vencer as batalhas e ter sucesso nos > ataques sem cultivar o espírito da iniciativa (A Arte da Guerra – SUN TSU – > pg 102)" >
