I don't know exactly how flat A = 398 is but it can't be very far off  F+, 
given that A = 392 would correspond to concert G.
I wonder if Anthony would agree therefore that since lots of the notes are 
sharp, a good starting point would be to pull the reed out a fraction?
C  

>-----Original Message-----
>From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu 
>[mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Anthony Robb
>Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 12:56 PM
>To: Dartmouth NPS
>Subject: [NSP] Chanter Tuning
>
>
>
>     From Chris Gregg:
>
>      So that is why my pipes always sound out of tune, and I 
>thought it
>   was
>      just poor musicianship on my part!
>      The whole tuning thing is a bit of a quagmire, and as a solo
>   instrument
>      it is not a problem, but I would like to know how people 
>get around
>   it
>      in recording sessions.
>
>
>   Hello Chris
>
>   This sounds to me as though your bottom G is a tad flat and 
>that's why
>   so many notes seem sharp.
>
>   The other thing to say is that the chanter, in all 
>likelihood, could be
>   brought in tune with careful use of PVA glue (for sharp notes) and a
>   scalpel fitted with an 11P blade (for flat notes).
>
>   Before doing anything drastic, however, I would get to know your
>   chanter's idiosyncrasies by removing the cotton wool plug, 
>if there is
>   one, from the bottom of the bore. Then I'd repeat your measurements
>   (draw up a table) with a cotton bud inserted at set 
>positions into the
>   bore. I'd start off with the rounded tip in at 10mm then go 
>up by 5mm
>   increments to within 15mm of your bottom D (for a 7 key chanter)
>   checking the tuning of each note as you go. Write down your 
>results so
>   the pattern can be seen at a glance. This will tell you how 
>much effect
>   the standing waves below each chanter note are affecting 
>the pitch of
>   each note. You might find one position will bring your 
>chanter closer
>   in tune with itself. If the cotton bud makes matters worse 
>I'd insert a
>   20mm narrow cone of cotton wool (point first) into the 
>chanter and see
>   if that helps.
>
>   If you do need to resort to scalpel & glue I'd do this with 
>the cotton
>   wool cone to minimise standing waves interfering with your tuning.
>
>   Let me know how you get on.
>
>   With regards to recording sessions every group of pipers of 
>pipers will
>   have their own solution. As you say solo is fine as the piper can
>   adjust where necessary. At the other end of the scale 
>massed pipes are
>   OK too because variations with 5 chanters or more tend to 
>balance out.
>   The trickiest we find is when 3 pipes are playing together. We found
>   that recording the three chanters together without drones (live or
>   recorded) works best as each of us listens out for what is happening
>   with the other players and adjusts where necessary. Then drones are
>   tuned to the chanters and added to the mix. This can mean up to 11.5
>   mins of constant drone without fingering the chanter at all which is
>   surprisingly tiring on the fingers. It also means that 
>chanters have to
>   be played at a fairly consistent pitch and in with each 
>other without
>   any external reference point at all. But then as we can see from the
>   recent posts external references are often a hindrance rather that a
>   help in that situation.
>
>   I hope some of this helps but please remember no theories whatsoever
>   have been used as a basis for this advice just 40 years 
>mucking about
>   with some of the loveliest chanters around (Burleigh, 
>Gruar, Hedworth,
>   Nelson and Ross) and nowt but my own lugs as final arbiter.
>
>   Good Luck
>
>   Anthony
>
>   --
>
>
>To get on or off this list see list information at
>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>


Reply via email to