>I don't know exactly how flat A = 398 is but it can't be very 
>far off  F+,

Sorry, badly worded. I mean it can't be very far off an A that would give you 
F+.
c


 given that A = 392 would correspond to concert G.
>I wonder if Anthony would agree therefore that since lots of 
>the notes are sharp, a good starting point would be to pull 
>the reed out a fraction?
>C  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] 
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Robb
>>Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 12:56 PM
>>To: Dartmouth NPS
>>Subject: [NSP] Chanter Tuning
>>
>>
>>
>>     From Chris Gregg:
>>
>>      So that is why my pipes always sound out of tune, and I 
>>thought it
>>   was
>>      just poor musicianship on my part!
>>      The whole tuning thing is a bit of a quagmire, and as a solo
>>   instrument
>>      it is not a problem, but I would like to know how people 
>>get around
>>   it
>>      in recording sessions.
>>
>>
>>   Hello Chris
>>
>>   This sounds to me as though your bottom G is a tad flat and 
>>that's why
>>   so many notes seem sharp.
>>
>>   The other thing to say is that the chanter, in all 
>>likelihood, could be
>>   brought in tune with careful use of PVA glue (for sharp 
>notes) and a
>>   scalpel fitted with an 11P blade (for flat notes).
>>
>>   Before doing anything drastic, however, I would get to know your
>>   chanter's idiosyncrasies by removing the cotton wool plug, 
>>if there is
>>   one, from the bottom of the bore. Then I'd repeat your measurements
>>   (draw up a table) with a cotton bud inserted at set 
>>positions into the
>>   bore. I'd start off with the rounded tip in at 10mm then go 
>>up by 5mm
>>   increments to within 15mm of your bottom D (for a 7 key chanter)
>>   checking the tuning of each note as you go. Write down your 
>>results so
>>   the pattern can be seen at a glance. This will tell you how 
>>much effect
>>   the standing waves below each chanter note are affecting 
>>the pitch of
>>   each note. You might find one position will bring your 
>>chanter closer
>>   in tune with itself. If the cotton bud makes matters worse 
>>I'd insert a
>>   20mm narrow cone of cotton wool (point first) into the 
>>chanter and see
>>   if that helps.
>>
>>   If you do need to resort to scalpel & glue I'd do this with 
>>the cotton
>>   wool cone to minimise standing waves interfering with your tuning.
>>
>>   Let me know how you get on.
>>
>>   With regards to recording sessions every group of pipers of 
>>pipers will
>>   have their own solution. As you say solo is fine as the piper can
>>   adjust where necessary. At the other end of the scale 
>>massed pipes are
>>   OK too because variations with 5 chanters or more tend to 
>>balance out.
>>   The trickiest we find is when 3 pipes are playing 
>together. We found
>>   that recording the three chanters together without drones (live or
>>   recorded) works best as each of us listens out for what is 
>happening
>>   with the other players and adjusts where necessary. Then drones are
>>   tuned to the chanters and added to the mix. This can mean 
>up to 11.5
>>   mins of constant drone without fingering the chanter at 
>all which is
>>   surprisingly tiring on the fingers. It also means that 
>>chanters have to
>>   be played at a fairly consistent pitch and in with each 
>>other without
>>   any external reference point at all. But then as we can 
>see from the
>>   recent posts external references are often a hindrance 
>rather that a
>>   help in that situation.
>>
>>   I hope some of this helps but please remember no theories 
>whatsoever
>>   have been used as a basis for this advice just 40 years 
>>mucking about
>>   with some of the loveliest chanters around (Burleigh, 
>>Gruar, Hedworth,
>>   Nelson and Ross) and nowt but my own lugs as final arbiter.
>>
>>   Good Luck
>>
>>   Anthony
>>
>>   --
>>
>>
>>To get on or off this list see list information at
>>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>
>
>
>


Reply via email to