The season before last Albion were promoted from the Championship, outplaying 
teams with (pains me to say it) very neat, passing football. They were a way 
better footballing side than any team in the Championship and tried to play 
exactly the same the following season in the Premiership. Only thing was they 
came up against teams doing the same as them, only better. They got relegated.

I reckon its smart thinking to have narrowed the pitch. While we may have been 
able to stretch teams across our wide pitch in the Championship last year, this 
year we're going to come up against far better teams who would actually use 
that extra space to do to us what we did to teams last year. Horses for courses 
and all that.

________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 2:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: This weekend

It was an odd decision, especially given we are aiming to be the youngest, 
fittest side in the league.  One would think that we'd want the big pitch to 
make other teams run around and tire more easily?  Perhaps it wasd more about 
being able to press teams more easily.

I assume you had no complaints about Mick's own width during those magical 
hours you spent with him in Perth?  Is that why you call him "Thick Mick"?  
It's making my eyes water just thinking about it

2009/9/29 Marcus Chantry 
<marcus.chan...@macquarie.com<mailto:marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>>
I think the whole width debate is quite interesting.  If Thick Mick ever 
intended to play with 2 wingers to create true width, why did he choose to 
reduce the width of the Molineux pitch to the minimum allowed under premier 
league rules?  I think Halford or Castillo can provide the grit in midfield 
that would allow Milijas the freedom to be the creative force.



Marcus Chantry   |  Associate Director

Senior Product Manager - Macquarie Life
Level 3, 1 Shelley Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia
T +61 2 8232 4259  |  M 0448 887 627

E marcus.chan...@macquarie.com<mailto:marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>



P


Please consider the environment before printing this email.





________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf 
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 1:46 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com<mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: This weekend

It's going to be like this all season I suspect.  Might come down to the last 
game to see if we can stay up.  I'm still hopeful but I don't expect early 
safety or relegation.

I reckon a draw on the weekend is a likely outcome.

Milijas has been quite lazy from all the reports I read and we know what Mick 
thinks of that.  However, a touch of class that scores the winner is worth 90 
minutes of running around.

I think with Milijas in we are also lightweight in midfield, especially if we 
want to keep some width.  We haven't seen true width yet with both Jarvis and 
Kightly in the side.  If we can have those two then I'd be for keeping both 
Henry and Castillo in.

There's a lot of debate over 442 vs 451 on Mol Mix. 442 is probably right for 
us but we lack a true trequartista.  Keogh is the closest we've got but he 
can't seem to score.  Can anyone else fill that position?  Is it Doyle?


2009/9/29 Marcus Chantry 
<marcus.chan...@macquarie.com<mailto:marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>>
So Pompey this weekend...

they don't a single point this season;
they have only scored 3 goals in 7 matches;
they have conceded 13 goals in 7 matches;

Are we going to add to their woes or are we going to join them in the bottom 3 
and kick-start their season?
Also, if Fulham & West Ham win their games in hand then we are in the bottom 3 
anyway.


The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the 
integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are 
the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.






Before printing, please consider the environment.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy 
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to