*Baaa-haaaaaaa-hahahahaha*
2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > not true... I was very happy after the last two results even if the > performances themselves weren't particularly confidence inspiring. > > I agree that I'm perhaps *slightly more pessimistic than some* but that's > simply because I want to see an continual improvement in results and to get > continual improvements you need to try and compete. But this morning, the > manager decided that it wasn't in our interests to compete and I find that > deeply flawed that professional sportsmen are being paid to go out and gift > a result to an opposing team. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:37 AM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] > > You're always well @#...@#ed off with Wolves/Mick anyway, so how would we > notice the difference? > > 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > >> considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and >> the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would have >> thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If they >> couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what will get >> their competitive juices flowing. >> >> If we beat Burnley then Mick will take the plaudits for a stroke of >> tactical genius and all will be forgotten, but given our record in "must win >> games" (i.e. Birmingham, Portsmouth), I certainly won't be putting any money >> on us getting the result. >> >> >> >> I'm just a bit annoyed that we conceded before we even stepped on the >> pitch. We could have forfeited the game and we would have recorded exactly >> the same result; a 3 - 0 against and then the entire squad would have been >> fresh for Sunday. I want to see my team compete against the best so then at >> least we would have had a chance at another "Kenny Miller" moment, but >> instead Mick decides it's a battle not worth fighting and takes the gamble >> that we will beat Burnley on Sunday. I hope we do otherwise I'm going to be >> well @#...@#ed off. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:18 AM >> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] >> >> Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: >> "Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against >> Burnley on Satuday?" >> >> 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> >> >>> the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing >>> and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player >>> list. >>> >>> I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to >>> play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in >>> front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of >>> matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best >>> in the game. >>> >>> I can just picture the stories to the kids: "Dad, what was it like to >>> play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?", Craddock says "I didn't get to play >>> that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend". >>> >>> Mick has made us a laughing stock. >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Paul Taylor >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM >>> >>> *To:* Wolves >>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] >>> >>> How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look >>> at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing >>> that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good >>> as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due >>> to fresh legs? >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] >>> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 >>> From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> >>> Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an >>> under strength team ;) >>> >>> -- >>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >>> ------------------------------ >>> Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail >>> inbox<http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here> >>> >>> -- >>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >>> >>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not >>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this >>> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee >>> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions >>> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of >>> Macquarie. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >>> >> >> -- >> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >> >> -- >> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >> > > -- > Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid > > -- > Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid > -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
