I know. It's like having George Best there to help get him off the booze. On 9 October 2010 09:19, Jeremy Tonks <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote:
> What chance has he got with Tony Daly working with him? > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Saturday, 9 October 2010 7:49 AM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > http://www.wolves.co.uk/page/News/0,,10307~2178742,00.html<http://www.wolves.co.uk/page/News/0,,10307%7E2178742,00.html> > > Looks like he will play. > > On 7 October 2010 12:16, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: > > He was substituted in the first match of the World Cup after 62 minutes and > didn't play again. Maybe his hacking cough at half time rang some warning > bells. Maybe it was because he had bought his own oranges that were > discovered to have been injected with vodka. Maybe an hour was long enough > for the coach to wait for some Cantona-style magic to change the game. > Maybe it was a lack of football for his club that made him too rusty. > > Believe me, I would like nothing better than for him to establish himself > as our creative midfielder as it's just what's needed alongside Henry. If > Dave Jones has thrown his toys out of the pram and will leave in January, as > is the rumour, then we might not have any choice but to give him a run. > > > > On 7 October 2010 11:59, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Never picked you as a crooner, but if that’s your thing them I’m sure we > could find you an appropriate stage based on your talents (another analogy > there similar to differences between Old Trafford and Molineux). > > > > Don’t you find it curious that Milijas can perform at international level > (despite drinking whisky and smoking a pack a day) yet when asked to play > the run and tackle (aka assault/mug) tactics that Thick Mick employs, it > doesn’t quite work. > > > > Once more it seems Thick Mick isn’t working with the resources he’s got > (and bought) rather he’s trying to force a scalpel to do a mallets job. > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:53 AM > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > Yes. I am a singer in the sytle of Frank Sinatra, albeit at a much lower > level. > > Can you get me a gig in Vegas please? > > I think we can reach agreement on this. What about if we say: > > "Milijas is like a sh1te version of Cantona, who could change a game with a > special pass or flick if he had a lot more skill, didn't have a bottle of > whisky for breakfast and didn't chin forty fags a day." > > On 7 October 2010 11:41, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Did I not qualify that by saying on a much lower level. I was comparing > the “style” of player not the “quality” of the player. Selective reading > there Mr Millward. > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:40 AM > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > Milijas = Cantona? > > No, no I don't agree. Can you find me soneone else that does? > > On 7 October 2010 11:38, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > You don’t agree then…? > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 11:38 AM > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > What a load of bollocks. > > On 7 October 2010 10:42, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > I think Milijas is our Berbatov or Cantona (albeit on a much lower level). > They each have the technical ability to change a game with a flick or a > special pass but they just look like they’re not trying or look lazy. That > style of play is never going to sit well with Thick Mick. > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:39 AM > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > He might get a game on Saturday apparently, if he looks good in training. > He's been on a special programme to get him fit. > > Otherwise it will be Jones, which presumably means 442 > > On 7 October 2010 10:17, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Last time I checked Thick Mick refused to play our ‘only’ creative > midfielder, Milijas, so the chances of us ever playing 2 creative > midfielders is absolutely zero, because we don’t have two in our entire > squad. If you’re looking for hard work and graft, then Mick reckons we’ve > got that in spades. > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:57 AM > > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > I picked this as it's the closest formation and team to the one that beat > West Ham 3-1 last season. 451 works fine, especially if there are two > "creative midfielders" > > 442 hasn't worked for us at all this season and it's widely regarded to > have no place in modern football so I can't understand why so many people > demand it, even if it's dressed up as 4132 > > On 7 October 2010 09:51, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Can we please drop Edwards and put SEB up front. A nice simple 4-1-3-2 > formation. If we don’t go in with an attacking game plan against West Ham > then we can forget staying up. > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:49 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > > > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > Hard choice for West Ham: > > > > --------------------Hahnemann----------------------------- > Foley-----Craddock------Berra---Big Gay George > ------------------------Mancienne-------------------------- > Edwards-----Jones------------Miljas------------Jarvis > --------------------------Doyle-------------------------------- > > On 7 October 2010 09:07, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> > wrote: > > Same old, same old Lee. > > > > Thick Mick picks his favourites irrespective of whether or not they are in > form or even playing in their natural positions. > > > > Hahneman is out of form and doesn’t look the same commanding player he was > last season. > > Craddock is another 5 yards off the pace compared to last year > > Berra wants to join a hugging commune > > Jarvis has forgotten how to cross > > Ward can’t see past the end of his nose > > Doyle wants to be a one-man-show > > > > The rest are just sh1te. > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 October 2010 9:03 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [BTMO] Trouble [sec=unclassified] > > > > Guidiera out long term, Hunt and Kightly not ready, Edwards being picked, > Henry suspended and now Jean Claude wants out......we are in trouble chaps. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
