Chuck Mancienne in for Fletcher, he's defensive and attacking...lol
 
So I'd go
 
Marcus Hahnemann

Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme

Stephen Hunt - Mancienne - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis

Sylvan Ebanks-Blake - Kevin Doyle



________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]


If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt 
in the forward 3
 
Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but who's 
going to give them the ball?


On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote:


        I like the personnel that Andy has put up - not sure I'd line them up 
the same way.

        Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as 
the 3 & the 3 run their bollocks off).

         

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Steven Millward
        Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]

         

        It's basically back to the old "two banks of five players" that they 
used in the late nineteenth century.  It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 
but it's hardly appropriate now.

         

        Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise?

        On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew <matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au> 
wrote:

        2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin 
Keegan tactics that.

         

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
        Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 

        
        Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]

         

        What no Milijas?

         

        ¼hr size=2 width="100%" aligî>3Dcenter> 

        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
        Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick

        I like that line-up.  Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, 
Edwards, Craddock).

         

        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Andy
        Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick

         

        after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team 
for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the 
interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. 
        I think regardlees of postion, 
        Sylvan Ebanks-Blake
        Steven Fletcher
        should be in the starting 11
        drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place.
        take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place.
        So my starting 11 would be

        Marcus Hahnemann

        Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme
        
        Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis
        
        Sylvan Ebanks-Blake                                                     
                                Steven Fletcher
        
        Kevin Doyle
        
        

        Just my thoughts,
        
        Swampy

        
        
        
        

        On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: 

        Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website.  If 
only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... 

          

        
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm
 

          

        The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this 
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee 
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed 
are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

         

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        
        
        
        
        
        =======
        Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
        (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140)
        http://www.pctools.com 
<http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> 
        ======= 

        
        
        
        
        
        =======
        Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
        (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140)
        http://www.pctools.com 
<http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> 
        ======= 

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

        Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: 
This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by 
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged 
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken 
transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised 
alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message 
are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the 
RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from 
your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part 
of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

         

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to