You'll have to do better than that to keep these debates going Rog. You're the only person I'll have to argue with once Marcus comes to Mick's side.
On 28 March 2011 20:36, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: > You’re right Steve, 4-4-2 wouldn’t be any good for us, we’ve got Mick in > charge. > > > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 28 March 2011 7:34 PM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury > > > > For a team that cost 15m to assemble I think we do quite well. You said > you'd be happy when we competed with the likes of Fulham, Everton and > Villa. I reckon we are competing with them but they have all bought single > players that cost about the same as our entire first XI. We have no right > to be any higher than we are, and I reckon under manay managers we would > have been relegated by now. > > As for 451, it gets us results and is in line with the way that many of the > top teams around the world set up their formations. We control the midfield > and with two attacking wingers and two attacking midfielders we have enough > scoring options. It's paid off against some very good teams. > > Putting a second man up front doesn't guarantee goals if you can't get the > ball to them or the defenders cover them in the absence of any other > attacking threat. > > You must be getting mixed up with netball where only the front two are > allowed to score. > > Now, you were about to explain the benefits of 442? > > > On 28 March 2011 13:29, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: > > I struggle to understand your love of our 4-5-1-0 formation. > > Doyle’s credited with 5 goals this season, that includes 2 penalties and a > Big George effort. > > He’d at least have doubled his tally playing in any other team in this > division. > > With almost any other manager from this division we wouldn’t have spent two > seasons bouncing along the bottom. > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 28 March 2011 12:12 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > > > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury > > > > I'm struggling to understand your love of 442 Rog. > > > > Have you got any examples of modern teams that play a true 442 formation? > By modern, I measn not from the 1970s to the 1990s > > > > > On 28 March 2011 09:49, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote: > > Play someone up front to score goals Paul? > > Hang on, now you’re suggesting we might play two forwards? > > Hope Mick doesn’t read that, his 97 year old heart couldn’t take it. > > > > > > > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Paul Crowe > *Sent:* Monday, 28 March 2011 8:30 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury > > > > Maybe cruciate ligament damage and out for the rest of the season. Just our > luck!! > > > > SEB does not have the engine to play the same role as Doyle. Fletcher will > get the nod to play or we might change tactics and play both of them up > front! > > > > Paul Crowe > > Sales Manager - Asia Pacific > > > > ConTech (Sydney Office) > > > > PO Box 3517 > > Rhodes Waterside > > Rhodes NSW 2138 > > Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 > > Mob: 0406009562 > > Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com > > Website: www.contechengineering.com > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Sunday, 27 March 2011 10:51 AM > *To:* nswolves > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Doyle knee injury > > > > Scan tomorrow. Could be out for a bit. Time for Fletch and/or SEB to step > up, and a big chance for them. > > International football is toss. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
