Apparently Hammill and Mick had a falling out on the training ground. So Mick has dropped him, and the whole team spirit has dropped as a result.
But at least Mick has shown him who's boss. They should use this on wikipedia to illustate what "cutting off your nose to spite your face" means. On 27 April 2011 10:52, Morris, Lee SGT <lee.mor...@defence.gov.au> wrote: > > Maybe he new we'd all take the piss out of him when he was saying "maybe > I should have started Milijas instead of Mancienne"??????? > > and what the hell as happened to Hamill??? > > ------------------------------ > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:49 > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Stoke > > How about when around 2-0 down, MM was talking to TC and covered his mouth > with his hand so no-one could lip read what he was saying to TC? Like > anyone, such as Stoke, 2-0 up and on top, would care ? > > Probably discussing their employment prospects. > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steven Millward > <millward....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> [image: Wolves boss Mick McCarthy] >> >> >> On 27 April 2011 08:11, LEESE Matthew <matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au>wrote: >> >>> 1st goal was a re-run of Everton's 1st the other week. Osman/Pennant >>> down the right with a ball played into our box whereby a six foot something >>> striker (Beckford/Jones) manages to somehow go unnoticed and find himself >>> with space between 2 defenders. Easy header, 1-0. >>> >>> I've not read McCarthy's post match interview but I could pretty much >>> recite it word for word I reckon. Plenty of praise for his players and >>> claims that if we stick together and show the spirit (absent in games, >>> presumably evident in training?) he knows we have, we will stay up. Other >>> teams have to pick up points you know (which is not actually true and won't >>> be necessary the way we're going). Its like watching Sunderland get >>> relegated all over again. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Paul Crowe >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:36 AM >>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Stoke >>> >>> Going down! >>> >>> MM out! >>> >>> Marcus and Rog were right! >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul Crowe >>> >>> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific >>> >>> >>> >>> ConTech (Sydney Office) >>> >>> >>> >>> PO Box 3517 >>> >>> Rhodes Waterside >>> >>> Rhodes NSW 2138 >>> >>> Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 >>> >>> Mob: 0406009562 >>> >>> Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com >>> >>> Website: www.contechengineering.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 27 April 2011 6:22 AM >>> *To:* nswolves >>> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Stoke >>> >>> >>> >>> Excellent team selection and great performance. We've been really >>> unlucky tonight. >>> >>> -- >>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? >>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. >>> >>> -- >>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? >>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. >>> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This >>> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the >>> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged >>> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any >>> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any >>> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed >>> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily >>> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please >>> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not >>> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended >>> recipient. >>> >>> -- >>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? >>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. >>> >> >> -- >> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? >> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. >> > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
