UNCLASSIFIED

Thats right, lets have our own poll then.
 
For MM = Against MM  (I'm against but only if a suitable replacement is
available)
 
Should Henry be our first choice defensive midfielder = Should we sign
someone specifically to replace him (I think we need someone better in
his position)
 
I also happen to believe we desperately need another quality striker.


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.


________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:40
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Stats can be made to support any agenda that a person wants to push.
Climate Change is the perfect example of how both sides can manipulate
statistics to support their own agenda.  


On 20/12/2011, at 08:36 , Jeremy Tonks wrote:


        You've missed the point Lee ;)

        

        How much is he being paid?

        

        I'm not sure 1 game without him this season gives us any
statistical validity?!

        I think I'd like to see which games he missed (as in opponents)
as well.

        

        

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
        Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:30 AM
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: [NSWolves] Karl Henry Stats [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

        

        UNCLASSIFIED

        Whilst on the subject of statistics, did anyone else see the
Karl Henry stats on Mol Mix?

        

        Are these stats too much of a coincidence????

        

        

        2010-2011 - With Karl Henry
        P28 ( + 1 sub )
        W7 ( 21 points )
        D6 ( 6 points )
        L16
        Pts: 27

        

        2010-2011 - Without Karl Henry
        P9 
        W4 ( 12 points )
        D1 ( 1 point )
        L4
        Pts: 13 points
        
        
        2011-2012 - With Karl Henry
        P 14 
        W3 ( 9 points )
        D2 ( 2 points )
        L9
        Pts: 11
        
        2011-2012 - Without Karl Henry
        P1 
        W1 ( 3 points )
        Pts: 3

        

        

        

        IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
        Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:21
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

        I'm not going to put Sunderland in that basket for a few more
weeks yet...

        ...and the wages statistics still tell me that Sh*te will fall
on their collective backsides sooner rather than later :-)

        

        

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
        Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:15 AM
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

        

        UNCLASSIFIED

        There lies the problem because first the Baggies and now
Sunderland have nicked the obvious candidates...we have dithered too
much....

        

        IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
        Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 07:13
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

        You raise good points Lee but you fail in the usual way... just
who is it that is going to replace MM?

        

        

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
        Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 8:09 AM
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew [sec=unclassified]
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

        

        UNCLASSIFIED

        So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they
should be, simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace
the dross they had previoulsy....I rest my case.

        

        Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal
terms when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to
battle along with MM.

        

        Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT
the need for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan
in the face after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping
the gun with the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I
understand the timing aspect re the economy......I blame Mick for the
way we play...its horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the
championship more.

        

        

        

        IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes
Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
contact the sender and delete the email.

        
________________________________


        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
        Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew

        I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested
        http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061
        
        Here's some more interesting data in the table below.
        
        League rank is the position that the team finished in the league
        Wage rank is the position forecast by wages
        
        You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league
position. 
        10 teams are within one position of their prediction. 
        15 teams are within two positions of their prediction
        18 teams are within three positions of their prediction.
        
        I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference
between the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones
that seemingly outperformed their resources.
        
        You'll notice all the "good" managers are near the top of the
list:
        Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - McCARTHY
        
        The way I see if you can say that either management is important
and Mick is a good manager or management is unimportant.  
        
        There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a
bad manager because the facts don't support it.
        
        Team..........League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference 
        West Brom..........11..............19................8 
        Fulham................8...............11.......... ......3 
        Stoke................13...............15.......... ......2 
        Spurs..................5................7......... .......2 
        Man Utd..............1................3............... ..2 
        Wolves..............17...............18........... .....1 
        Blackpool...........19...............20........... .....1 
        Arsenal...............4.................5......... .......1 
        Everton..............7.................8.......... ......1 
        Wigan...............16...............16........... .....0 
        Newcastle..........12...............12............ ....0 
        Bolton...............14...............14.......... ......0 
        Chelsea..............2.................1.......... .....-1 
        Birmingham.........18...............17............ ..-1 
        Man City.............3.................2.............. .-1 
        Liverpool.............6.................4......... ......-2 
        Sunderland.........10................8............ ....-2 
        Aston villa...........9.................6...............-3 
        Blackburn...........15...............12........... ....-3 
        West Ham..........20................8...............-12

        On 19 December 2011 15:03, Paul Crowe
<pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:

        Hughes's Granny would be better than MM!

        

        Maybe we should just enlist a local Gypsy  as replacement for
MM, as our teams performance depends on luck and other dubiously
explained factors, nothing at all to do with the Manager and his
coaching skills?

        

        Paul Crowe

        Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

        

        ConTech (Sydney Office)

        

        PO Box 3517

        Rhodes Waterside

        Rhodes NSW  2138

        Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

        Mob: 0406009562

        Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com

        Website: www.contechengineering.com
<http://www.contechengineering.com/> 

        

        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
        Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 2:52 PM

        
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
        Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew

        

        Hold the front page.  What a scoop!

        On 19 December 2011 11:09, Paul Hart <wholiga...@gmail.com>
wrote:

        I spoke to my mate last night in Penn he heard Hughes was there.


        

        Well just have to wait and see.
        
        Sent from my iPhone

        
        On 19/12/2011, at 11:05 AM, Steven Millward
<millward....@gmail.com> wrote:

                He dared to make a positive comment about Wolves and the
filter kicked him out.  I've hacked it.
                
                Where is that rumour from?

                On 19 December 2011 11:00, Paul Hart
<wholiga...@gmail.com> wrote:

                
                 Why were you bannned Matthew ?
                 Did you dare to ask for the head of MM
                
                 Has anybody else heard the rumour
                 That Mark Hughes was at the Stoke
                 game ???
                
                
                Sent from my iPhone
                
                --
                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.


        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.
        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out.
        


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out.

Reply via email to