Yes, so using this theory: West Brom are 8 places above where they should be Liverpool are 2 places below where they should be
Same man responsible for both. Is he a good manager or a bad manager? On 20 December 2011 08:08, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > *UNCLASSIFIED* > So using this theory, West Brom are 8 places above where they should be, > simply because they found a bloody good manager to replace the dross they > had previoulsy....I rest my case. > > Again using West Brom as an example, we were just about on equal terms > when they appointed their current manager whilst we continued to battle > along with MM. > > Of course wages make a difference, as the table below shows, BUT the need > for higher quality should have been staring MM and Steve Morgan in the face > after the struggle last season...I blame Morgan for jumping the gun with > the stadium...rather than spending more on players, but I understand the > timing aspect re the economy......I blame Mick for the way we play...its > horrible sub standard stuff...I think I enjoyed the championship more. > > > > *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence > and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If > you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the > sender and delete the email. > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:31 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew > > I've taken my points on to Molineux Mix if anyone's interested > http://molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=66061 > > Here's some more interesting data in the table below. > > League rank is the position that the team finished in the league > Wage rank is the position forecast by wages > > You'll notice that wages are a great predicitor of league position. > 10 teams are within one position of their prediction. > 15 teams are within two positions of their prediction > 18 teams are within three positions of their prediction. > > I've sorted the table by the last column which is the difference between > the league and wage ranking. The teams at the top are the ones that > seemingly outperformed their resources. > > You'll notice all the "good" managers are near the top of the list: > Hodgson - Pulis - Redknapp - Ferguson - *McCARTHY* > > The way I see if you can say that *either* management is important and > Mick is a good manager *or* management is unimportant. > > There's no room to say that managment is important and Mick is a bad > manager because the facts don't support it. > > Team..........League Rank...Wage Rank...Difference > West Brom..........11..............19................8 > Fulham................8...............11.......... ......3 > Stoke................13...............15.......... ......2 > Spurs..................5................7......... .......2 > Man Utd..............1................3............... ..2 > Wolves..............17...............18........... .....1 > Blackpool...........19...............20........... .....1 > Arsenal...............4.................5......... .......1 > Everton..............7.................8.......... ......1 > Wigan...............16...............16........... .....0 > Newcastle..........12...............12............ ....0 > Bolton...............14...............14.......... ......0 > Chelsea..............2.................1.......... .....-1 > Birmingham.........18...............17............ ..-1 > Man City.............3.................2.............. .-1 > Liverpool.............6.................4......... ......-2 > Sunderland.........10................8............ ....-2 > Aston villa...........9.................6...............-3 > Blackburn...........15...............12........... ....-3 > West Ham..........20................8...............-12 > > On 19 December 2011 15:03, Paul Crowe <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hughes’s Granny would be better than MM!**** >> >> **** >> >> Maybe we should just enlist a local Gypsy as replacement for MM, as our >> teams performance depends on luck and other dubiously explained factors, >> nothing at all to do with the Manager and his coaching skills?**** >> >> **** >> >> Paul Crowe**** >> >> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific**** >> >> **** >> >> ConTech (Sydney Office)**** >> >> **** >> >> PO Box 3517**** >> >> Rhodes Waterside**** >> >> Rhodes NSW 2138**** >> >> Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542**** >> >> Mob: 0406009562**** >> >> Email: [email protected]**** >> >> Website: www.contechengineering.com**** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >> *Sent:* Monday, 19 December 2011 2:52 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew**** >> >> **** >> >> Hold the front page. What a scoop!**** >> >> On 19 December 2011 11:09, Paul Hart <[email protected]> wrote:**** >> >> I spoke to my mate last night in Penn he heard Hughes was there. **** >> >> **** >> >> Well just have to wait and see. >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 19/12/2011, at 11:05 AM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> >> wrote:**** >> >> He dared to make a positive comment about Wolves and the filter kicked >> him out. I've hacked it. >> >> Where is that rumour from?**** >> >> On 19 December 2011 11:00, Paul Hart <[email protected]> wrote:**** >> >> >> Why were you bannned Matthew ? >> Did you dare to ask for the head of MM >> >> Has anybody else heard the rumour >> That Mark Hughes was at the Stoke >> game ??? >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
