I have to confess I get frustrated by the apparent lack of logic that's applied to football support. There are many people on here have excellent analytical abilities and yet it gets unused in the face of what seems more like superstition and knee jerk emotion. Rog for example applies a great deal of analysis to backing horses. Marcus works in insurance, where actuaries are the backbone of the business and are some of the highest paid statisticians in any profession.
I took it upon myself to analyse wages versus position last season and found a correlation stronger than I have ever found in 15 years of analysing business problems and relationships. I then found that someone more skilled than me had already done it, which is why I'm going to read his book. The example you give below seems to fall in the superstition camp. We all form qualitative assessments of managers and how good they are. I would contend that none of us know what we are talking about when it comes to assessing managers, and in any case they have little impact on league position. You also mention "form". Player form has been proven not to exist, in football and any other game. Another superstition based on humans being pattern seeking and never seeking to rigourously justify it. I guess this is how most superstitions start. On 19 December 2011 11:10, LEESE Matthew <[email protected]>wrote: > > The conspiracy theorist in me thought my 'ban' was down to my movement > away from the pro-Mick camp but then realised if that were the case the > list would have 2 active posters. Gave it some more (reasoned) thought and > worked out it was probably down to the fact our email addresses have just > been changed at work and so I was likely not recognised by the server. > Shame, I'd fired off a couple of super witty responses to comments last > week that never got through. > > Mark Hughes eh? Interesting one. I had an interesting converstaion with > Elliot on Saturday (really, I did!) about how I wouldn't mind Bolton's poor > form continuing and getting Owen Coyle at Molineux. I had no answer to his > very sound argument that it is pretty ridiculous to be saying 'Not happy > with our current manager, would like to swap him for the one that's > currently got his team bottom of the league'. Despite my extra sobriety now > compared to Saturday, I still don't have an answer, but I do quite like him > and particularly the style of football he gets his teams playing. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Hart > Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 11:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [NSWolves] Welcome Back Matthew > > > Why were you bannned Matthew ? > Did you dare to ask for the head of MM > > Has anybody else heard the rumour > That Mark Hughes was at the Stoke > game ??? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > Before printing, please consider the environment > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
