Do you really think Martin O'Neill would have come to Wolves? On 14 February 2012 09:05, LEESE Matthew <matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au>wrote:
> ** > Not a very appealing list that is it! > > Billy Davies is someone I've thought about for Wolves before - he did well > with both Derby and Forest with limited resources but he's a feisty fella > and seems to have a habit of falling out with his chairmen. My brother's a > Derby fan and was gutted at the way things panned out there - reckons he > was a victim of his own sucess in some ways as he was building with a long > term plan but they got promoted via the play offs probably a year before > Davies was aiming for and they were not ready for the Prem. > > The question now is whether Wolves take a gamble on someone doing well in > the lower leagues or go for someone who's managed in the Premiership > before. Personally I'd like to see us take a gamble, particularly as the > available managers with Premiership experience don't inspire me at all. I > think we missed the boat with Martin O'Neill - let's look for someone > looking to make the step up. Gus Poyet might be worth a punt, aside from > that I've not been following the lower leagues closely enough to make > suggestions of suitable candidates but that's the route I'd like to see us > take. > > Mick should be congratulated for his achievements with Wolves - he took > over a threadbare squad who were tipped for relegation when Hoddle walked > out a couple of weeks before the season started (didn't we have something > like 14 senior pros on the books at the time?) and after a successful first > season got us promoted the following year. He then achieved the all > important task of keeping us up that first season but its at that point > that I'd have liked to have seen the board take a more progressive appraoch > and replace him. I think he'd achieved all he was likely/able to and we > needed to recognise that in order to move forwards we needed a different > manager. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 11:17 PM > > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > 4/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Steve Bruce**** > > 4/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Alan Curbishley**** > > 6/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Dave Jones**** > > 7/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Neil Warnock**** > > 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> – Rafa Benitez**** > > 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Alan Shearer**** > > 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Gianfranco Zola**** > > 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Chris Hughton**** > > 11/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Roberto Di Matteo**** > > 12/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Ole Gunnar Solksjaer**** > > 12/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Billy Davis**** > > 14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Darren Ferguson**** > > 14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> – Nigel Worthington**** > > 14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Karl Robinson**** > > ** ** > > Pretty skinny odds when the field is not even known.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 11:03 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** > > ** ** > > What price is Roy Keane?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Paul Hart > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 10:53 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** > > ** ** > > No the money is on Alan Curbishley at the moment ! > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:46 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:* > *** > > does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from > Brighton?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** > > > ** > ****** > > Make em put a shift in !!!! > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:* > *** > > In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of > manager who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the > type of players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can > motivate grafters.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** > > > ** > ****** > > Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet?**** > > ** ** > > There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol Rovers. > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** > > > ** > ****** > > Sorry meant to say Graham turner > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:* > *** > > Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!!**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** > > > ** > ****** > > Stuart Pearce**** > > Alan curbishley**** > > Grahame souness > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> > wrote:**** > > I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic > names down as replacements > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:* > *** > > He's GONE!!!!!**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote:**** > > > ** > ****** > > Clipboard in charge. Lol > > On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote:**** > > Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I watched > this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first time I have > EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t.**** > > Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one > clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my > fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?**** > > Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the first > half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and got > absolutely flogged.**** > > **** > > There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had > Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.**** > > **** > > I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L**** > > **** > > Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** > > **** > > I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone > can say we lack pace. > > I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the > night has anything to do with it. > > Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't > it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan > said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was > unrealistic to think we'd improve much. > > > ** > ****** > > On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote:** > ** > > I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to > watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means > you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our > ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who > felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were > fighting amongst themselves.**** > > **** > > After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there > would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this > season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so > people should be entitled to criticize. **** > > **** > > However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with > our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if > progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. > > Sent from my iPhone**** > > > On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: > **** > > Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon > during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We > thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this > year. So what?**** > > **** > > It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the > Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and > support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem > Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment**** > > **** > > **** > > > **** > > On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA <jpar...@munichre.com> > wrote:**** > > I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.**** > > Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.**** > > Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.**** > > **** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > **** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** > > **** > > *UNCLASSIFIED***** > > A bit late.**** > > **** > > Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men**** > > **** > > *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence > and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If > you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the > sender and delete the email.**** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** > > apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of > protest demanding Mick's head. **** > > **** > > On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** > > **** > > I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. **** > > **** > > On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** > > **** > > Should have been 6**** > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** > > sorry, 5 at home.**** > > On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** > > > > ** > ****** > > so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? > **** > > On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** > > > > ** > ****** > > Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence > to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is > confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may > be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group > will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. > Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where > the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the > Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action > taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this > message.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out!**** > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > > [image: Logo] > > Before printing, please consider the environment > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > -- Boo! Clipboard out!
