Like Ancellotti, I think there was no chance that he would have come to Wolves. You might as well say Ferguson or Wenger as either of those two.
On 14 February 2012 10:12, LEESE Matthew <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > Probably. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 10:10 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > Do you really think Martin O'Neill would have come to Wolves? > > On 14 February 2012 09:05, LEESE Matthew <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ** >> Not a very appealing list that is it! >> >> Billy Davies is someone I've thought about for Wolves before - he did >> well with both Derby and Forest with limited resources but he's a feisty >> fella and seems to have a habit of falling out with his chairmen. My >> brother's a Derby fan and was gutted at the way things panned out there - >> reckons he was a victim of his own sucess in some ways as he was building >> with a long term plan but they got promoted via the play offs probably a >> year before Davies was aiming for and they were not ready for the Prem. >> >> The question now is whether Wolves take a gamble on someone doing well in >> the lower leagues or go for someone who's managed in the Premiership >> before. Personally I'd like to see us take a gamble, particularly as the >> available managers with Premiership experience don't inspire me at all. I >> think we missed the boat with Martin O'Neill - let's look for someone >> looking to make the step up. Gus Poyet might be worth a punt, aside from >> that I've not been following the lower leagues closely enough to make >> suggestions of suitable candidates but that's the route I'd like to see us >> take. >> >> Mick should be congratulated for his achievements with Wolves - he took >> over a threadbare squad who were tipped for relegation when Hoddle walked >> out a couple of weeks before the season started (didn't we have something >> like 14 senior pros on the books at the time?) and after a successful first >> season got us promoted the following year. He then achieved the all >> important task of keeping us up that first season but its at that point >> that I'd have liked to have seen the board take a more progressive appraoch >> and replace him. I think he'd achieved all he was likely/able to and we >> needed to recognise that in order to move forwards we needed a different >> manager. >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 11:17 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >> >> 4/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Steve Bruce**** >> >> 4/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Alan Curbishley**** >> >> 6/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Dave Jones**** >> >> 7/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Neil Warnock**** >> >> 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> – Rafa Benitez**** >> >> 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Alan Shearer**** >> >> 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Gianfranco Zola**** >> >> 10/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Chris Hughton**** >> >> 11/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Roberto Di Matteo**** >> >> 12/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Ole Gunnar Solksjaer*** >> * >> >> 12/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Billy Davis**** >> >> 14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Darren Ferguson**** >> >> 14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> – Nigel Worthington**** >> >> 14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/out.php?url=8> - Karl Robinson**** >> >> **** >> >> Pretty skinny odds when the field is not even known.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 11:03 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> **** >> >> What price is Roy Keane?**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Paul Hart >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 10:53 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> **** >> >> No the money is on Alan Curbishley at the moment ! >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:46 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> **** >> >> does anyone think we'd have a chance of enticing Gus Poyet away from >> Brighton?**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> Make em put a shift in !!!! >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:40 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> **** >> >> In reality though I don't think we're going to attract the type of >> manager who wants to play "attractive" football. There simply aren't the >> type of players in our squad to play that style. We need a manager who can >> motivate grafters.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:37 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet?**** >> >> **** >> >> There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol >> Rovers.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> Sorry meant to say Graham turner >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> **** >> >> Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!!**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote:**** >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> Stuart Pearce**** >> >> Alan curbishley**** >> >> Grahame souness >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> >> wrote:**** >> >> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic >> names down as replacements >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: >> **** >> >> He's GONE!!!!!**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote:**** >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> Clipboard in charge. Lol >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <[email protected]> wrote:*** >> * >> >> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I >> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first time >> I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t.**** >> >> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my >> fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas?**** >> >> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the first >> half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and got >> absolutely flogged.**** >> >> **** >> >> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had >> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold.**** >> >> **** >> >> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L**** >> >> **** >> >> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Steven Millward >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> **** >> >> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >> anyone can say we lack pace. >> >> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the >> night has anything to do with it. >> >> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing >> isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and >> Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was >> unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote:* >> *** >> >> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means >> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who >> felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were >> fighting amongst themselves.**** >> >> **** >> >> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this >> season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so >> people should be entitled to criticize. **** >> >> **** >> >> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line >> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even >> if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >> >> Sent from my iPhone**** >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> >> wrote:**** >> >> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon >> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We >> thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this >> year. So what?**** >> >> **** >> >> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of >> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and >> support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem >> Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> >> **** >> >> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA <[email protected]> >> wrote:**** >> >> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.**** >> >> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse.**** >> >> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> ------------------------------ >> >> **** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]**** >> >> **** >> >> *UNCLASSIFIED***** >> >> A bit late.**** >> >> **** >> >> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men**** >> >> **** >> >> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >> contact the sender and delete the email.**** >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >> >> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >> protest demanding Mick's head. **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> **** >> >> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. **** >> >> **** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:**** >> >> **** >> >> Should have been 6**** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies**** >> >> sorry, 5 at home.**** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:**** >> >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >> home?**** >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:**** >> >> >> >> ** >> ****** >> >> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence >> to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> ------------------------------ >> >> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >> message.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> **** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out!**** >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> >> [image: Logo] >> >> Before printing, please consider the environment >> >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only >> to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may >> contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is >> waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime >> Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this >> e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of >> the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you >> receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system >> and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this >> e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. >> >> -- >> Boo! Clipboard out! >> > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > > [image: Logo] > > Before printing, please consider the environment > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! > -- Boo! Clipboard out!
