If Hughton is as good as everyone reckons then I expect him to go to Albion. I 
like Holloway as a man for the same reasons I like mick. Honest. 

Poyet hasn't got enough management experience. 

On 10/05/2012, at 8:14 AM, "Paul Crowe" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anyone else?
>  
> What do people think of this short list: Holloway, Houghton, Ranieri and 
> Poyet?
>  
> Oh and we can add MM for Steve!
>  
> Paul Crowe
> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
>  
> ConTech (Sydney Office)
>  
> PO Box 3517
> Rhodes Waterside
> Rhodes NSW  2138
> Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
> Mob: 0406009562
> Email: [email protected]
> Website: www.contechengineering.com
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2012 8:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fellow relegated sides
>  
> Mick McCarthy. Young as managers go. Hard as nails defender. Experience of 
> getting teams promoted. 
> 
> On 10/05/2012, at 7:24 AM, "Paul Crowe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I ask the question again, who would you have as our next Manager Steve?
>  
> MM doesn’t count as he has tried and failed.
>  
> Paul Crowe
> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
>  
> ConTech (Sydney Office)
>  
> PO Box 3517
> Rhodes Waterside
> Rhodes NSW  2138
> Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
> Mob: 0406009562
> Email: [email protected]
> Website: www.contechengineering.com
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2012 6:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fellow relegated sides
>  
> So Hughton might be available now.  Although if he failed to get an immediate 
> return from Brum, why would he work for us.
> 
> On 8 May 2012 14:37, Paul Crowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just remember him being a very good “hard as nails” left back. Something 
> the Wolves badly need! He is also still fairly young as Manager’s go, tries 
> to play decent football and has experience of getting teams promoted back to 
> the Prem (Newcastle). He might also do it this year with Blues through the 
> play offs.
>  
> He is also a member of the Worker’s Revolutionary Party so that will keep Rog 
> happy!
>  
> We could do a lot worse than Chris Houghton. Who do you want to replace TC?
>  
> Paul Crowe
> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
>  
> ConTech (Sydney Office)
>  
> PO Box 3517
> Rhodes Waterside
> Rhodes NSW  2138
> Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
> Mob: 0406009562
> Email: [email protected]
> Website: www.contechengineering.com
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 May 2012 2:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Fellow relegated sides
>  
> What's the appeal of Houghton?
> 
> On 8 May 2012 14:14, Paul Crowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Refreshingly, I am in agreement with all of your points Steve.
>  
> It will be interesting to see if Bolton and Blackburn can keep their better 
> player’s.
>  
> I hope Venky’s remain in control of Blackburn, they are almost as badly 
> managed as us!
>  
> P.S. I would be happy with either of the 2 x Manager’s battling it out 
> tonight but would prefer Houghton.
>  
> Paul Crowe
> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
>  
> ConTech (Sydney Office)
>  
> PO Box 3517
> Rhodes Waterside
> Rhodes NSW  2138
> Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542
> Mob: 0406009562
> Email: [email protected]
> Website: www.contechengineering.com
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 May 2012 1:05 PM
> To: nswolves
> Subject: [NSWolves] Fellow relegated sides
>  
> I'm happy Blackburn have gone down.  I think they are in greater financial 
> trouble from this that we are.  I also like that someone bought them as a toy 
> and they will not see the downside of relegation.
>  
> I'd now like Bolton to come down as they will be in real trouble too.  
> There's a chance they could win at Stoke, whereas QPR are certain to lose 
> against city in my view.  QPR would be tougher opposition.as they have better 
> backing.
>  
>  
>  
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
>  
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
>  
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!

Reply via email to