Yep, just install the connector on the server in the DMZ. Yeah, you would
have to be crazy to have anything besides a firewall sitting on a valid IP. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:57 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host


The DMZ holds valid internet IP addresses and the firewall does use NAT
between our internal Exchange server and our SMTP server.  For example our
DMZ has our external web servers.  By being in the DMZ we can have the
firewall block everything except for HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and another other
ports we want.... this is more secure than just hangining it on the internet
without any firewall protection.

It's been a long while since I have had to mess with our exchange.  The
exchange connector.... can this be installed by itself on a server in the
DMZ without the rest of exchange?  Probably a stupid question... just
haven't messed with it in 2 1/2 years.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:35 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host


I dont know I have my exchange connector on my dmz and my email servers on
my internal LAN. I never had a problem in 2 years. But what ever makes you
guys all warm and fuzzy inside. How could you have your SMTP server in a DMZ
and not use NAT? Isn't the idea of a DMZ to not have a valid IP address to
the outside world? How do you tell your SMTP server to route to a valid IP?

-----Original Message-----
From: Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:29 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: Re: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host




            Exactly because of these security issue... Using this no NAT is
needed and there is no exposure of LAN resources...

            Thanks again... you are the greatest !

            Laercio Santos Jr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host


> I can't answer for Laercio, but we have our Exchange 5.5 behind our
Firewall
> and we have a relay host in the DMZ.  This way we still control what can
get
> to the relay host (just SMTP), and the relay host is allowed to transfer
to
> Exchange.  This way we have our exchange server, which has other services,
> completely isolated behind the firewall with private IP's.  Several
Security
> consultants preferred this method as well.. as opposed to opening a hole
to
> the inside of your private network through the firewall.
>
> I don't know about anyone else, but I feel a little better security wise.
> Could be a false sense, but it has worked great for us.  Our Relay host
has
> a limiter on it and if someone were to bomb our relay host it would not
> effect our primary server.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:21 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host
>
>
> Is there any reason why you aren't using Exchange Internet mail connector
to
> send SMTP mail?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:15 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: Re: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host
>
>
>
>
>             Hi Ed, we have 2 machines, one in the DMZ (W2K SMTP) and one @
> the LAN ex 5.5
>
>             Regards,
>
>
>             Laercio Santos Jr
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Esgro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:33 PM
> Subject: RE: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host
>
>
> > I am confused. Are you using Win2k SMTP service with Exchange 5.5? Why
not
> > use the Mail connector?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:22 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm receiving these errors...
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what does it means ???
> >
> > We've reinstalled new SMTP (W2K IIS5.0) and Exchange 5.5 (under W2K)
> Servers
> > and this error strarts...
> >
> > It seams that when I use the old smtp server it works normaly !!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ******* postmaster reply *****************
> > Reporting-MTA: dns;smtp.bancosantos.com.br
> > Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
> > Arrival-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:44:57 -0300
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.6.1
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.6.1
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host
> > ****************************************
> >
> > ******* Log info **********************
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:57 200.189.66.122 mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 EHLO - +mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br 250 0 256 34
0
> > SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:57 200.189.66.122 mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 MAIL -
+From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 250 0 62 75 0 SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:57 200.189.66.122 mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 RCPT - +To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250
> 0
> > 47 44 0 SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:57 200.189.66.122 mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 RCPT - +To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 0 35 32 0
> > SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:58 200.183.7.137 cauexcnt001smp.unibanco.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 EHLO - +cauexcnt001smp.unibanco.com.br 250 0 255
35
> 0
> > SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:58 200.189.66.122 mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 DATA -
> > +<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250
> 0
> > 152 128552 1531 SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:58 200.183.7.137 cauexcnt001smp.unibanco.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 MAIL - +FROM:<> 250 0 27 24 0 SMTP - - - -
> > 2001-08-30 18:44:58 200.189.66.122 mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br
SMTPSVC1
> > WMSF1 172.16.20.103 0 QUIT - mail.bolsadeimoveis-sp.com.br 0 1907 72 4 0
> > SMTP - - - -
> > *************************************
> >
> >
> >             Laercio Santos Jr
> >
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to