This would be a hard thing to recommend...here are a few reasons why....just off the top of my head...you need more specifics about what the backup system is trying to accomplish.
The correct solutions would depend on where the 200 GB/Week is from. * Is the 200 GB / week at one location? Distributed? * Is it all on a SAN? * Is it distributed on various servers? (ie. A few dozen servers with RAID1 and RAID5). * Is your network 100MB? * Where are the bottlenecks in the current backup system? * What is current system, and what are your aiming to upgrade to? Also, the solution will depend on other matters like: * What is your retention policy? * Is there a level of service that you are trying to achieve? (eg. be able to restore a SQL or Exchange mail system with XXX number of minutes, hours, or days) Leonard > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony L. > Sollars > Sent: March 29, 2002 1:19 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: Backup HArdware Advice. > > > > I am in the research of a complete re-design of our media > backup system. I > would like to get some advice from the field testers on which devices > and/or technologies such as SuperDLT, AIT, LTO are the best > in production. > We have only backup about 200 gigs a week. > > > Thanks, > > TOny > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
