-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony L. Sollars 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:34 AM
To: 'NT 2000 Discussions'
Subject: RE: Backup HArdware Advice.





-----Original Message-----
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 5:00 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup HArdware Advice.


This would be a hard thing to recommend...here are a few reasons why....just
off the top of my head...you need more specifics about what the backup
system is trying to accomplish.

The correct solutions would depend on where the 200 GB/Week is from.
* Is the 200 GB / week at one location?  Distributed?
  -  One geographic Location, but backups come from 10 or so servers. WE are
using Backup Exec with the agent accelerator.

* Is it all on a SAN?
  -  There is no SAN.

* Is it distributed on various servers?  (ie. A few dozen servers with RAID1
and RAID5). 
-Distributed amongst 10+ server all with RAID1 for OS and RAID5 for the
Data.

* Is your network 100MB?
-Network is 100MB FullDuplex with 1gig Copper backbones between switch
layers.

* Where are the bottlenecks in the current backup system?
-Bottlenecks are in amount of data we can backup, since we are using a
single tape backup right now.

* What is current system, and what are your aiming to upgrade to?

We are currently using a DLT4000 but are looking to move into a faster
technology.
Also, the solution will depend on other matters like:
* What is your retention policy?
-We store full backups each week and monthly, and recycle the daily tapes
every 2 weeks. Policy dictates one days loss is acceptable.

* Is there a level of service that you are trying to achieve?
(eg. be able to restore a SQL or Exchange mail system with XXX number of
minutes, hours, or days)
-One day.


Thanks for the input Leonard. What I am really asking is what new technology
ie. LTO, Super DLT, AIT is backing up data faster across a network.
As for the rest of the research I can do that on my own, which I have begun
to already. I know what these manufacturers are saying there hardware can
do,
but what they say it can do and what it actually does are two different
things, thanks again.

-TOny 


Leonard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony L.
> Sollars
> Sent: March 29, 2002 1:19 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: Backup HArdware Advice.
>
>
>
> I am in the research of a complete re-design of our media
> backup system. I
> would like to get  some advice from the field testers on which devices
> and/or technologies such as SuperDLT, AIT, LTO are the best
> in production.
> We have only backup about 200 gigs a week.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> TOny
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>


------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to