Upper management isn't interested in spending the money to do the upgrades to w2k yet. So right now it's a 'go with the flow and make it work' type mentality. Trust me I'm beating my head against the wall.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:22 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: IAS on NT 4.0 Marvin, I have to ask: why are you wanting to upgrade a server to Win2K (or introduce it) in your NT4.0 domain, and not wanting to make it the DC? Certainly 2K Server allows for NT4.0 BDC's, but a 2K server CANNOT be a BDC. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts/rationale. themolk. > -----Original Message----- > From: Marvin Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 20 June 2002 11:00 pm > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: IAS on NT 4.0 > > > Can some confirm for me the following: > 1. Is it possible to utilize a W2K server as a BDC on an > NT4.0 network? > Specifically, I'd like to know if I can have this w2k server > act as a BDC > and replicate the SAM or user databse to it. After which I'd > like to set up > IAS on the w2k box. > Any thoughts on this are appreciated. > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
