> In all cases, assume that the machine was well maintained, without a
> whole lot of crap or 3rd party psuedo fix it software.

That line alone rules out upgrades on every machine I've ever used, or
supported, for that matter.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:11 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Upgrading OS (was RE: install Windows 2000 professional)
> 
> 
> Here's my personal guideline, formed from my own experience, plus info
> from trusted colleagues.
> 
> In all cases, assume that the machine was well maintained, without a
> whole lot of crap or 3rd party psuedo fix it software.
> 
> NT to 2000 or XP ......... Highly Recommended Upgrade
> 2000 to XP ............... Highly Recommended Upgrade
> 
> Win 95/98 to NT .......... Not Recommended Upgrade
> Win 95/98 to 2000 ........ Not Recommended Upgrade
> Win 95/98 to XP .......... Barely Recommended Upgrade
> 
> WinME to anything ........ DO NOT EVER DO THIS unless enjoy trouble or
> are looking to improve your troubleshooting skills.
> 
>  
> 
> ASB
> http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB
>  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lum, David
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:32 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: Upgrading OS (was RE: install Windows 2000 professional)
> 
> 
> Interesting. I have upgraded several NT4 and Win98 machine to W2K with
> no issues. The NT4 upgrade is almost too easy! Win98 --> W2K 
> took 70mins
> on a PII 500 /64M RAM. Win95 is not as happy upgrading in my 
> experience,
> but the several  - over a dozen - 98/NT4 machines I've upgraded in a
> networked environment have given me zero problems. The only issue I've
> had is user confusion between Win98 ---> Win2K.
> 
> Of course time/resources allowing a fresh install is always 
> preferable.
> 
> Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
> 503-675-5510
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 09:16 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: install Windows 2000 professional
> 
> 
> I would HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend NEVER upgrading an os.
> Just back up data and do a fresh install.
> No need to bring up those issues.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Coughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:48 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: install Windows 2000 professional
> 
> 
> I was referring to an upgrade, not a transfer.  If the HP was 
> installed
> with a Windows OS, OEM or otherwise, an upgrade version of 
> W2K should be
> an option.
> 
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:24 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: install Windows 2000 professional
> 
> 
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, at 10:12am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If the HP had a Windows OS, you should be able to purchase a Win2K 
> > upgrade for the previous OS.
> 
>   Most PCs come with an "OEM" version of Windows, which is 
> licensed for
> that specific machine only.  It is not transferable to 
> another computer.
> 
>   Only the FPP (Full Packaged Product) license is transferable.
> 
> -- 
> Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> 

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to