The NG version is even much better than the v4.1. We have NG running for almost one year. It is very reliable and has been improved in the log. The only thing we don't like is their service and support. We are considering to switch the NG to cisco PIX. -----Original Message----- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:08 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: off topic: Checkpoint vs Cisco Pix
We currently use Checkpoint's Firewall-1 v4.1 with Securemote for VPN. However, Checkpoint has announced that they will end support for 4.1 this June. Consequently, I need to either upgrade to NG or replace it with another solution. The other solution is a Cisco Pix 515E. I saw some surveys comparing the two but those were limited to 4.1 not the NG solution. Checkpoint is more in $ but having used it for over 4 years, I am more comfortable with it. Can someone help me out by relaying your experience with either NG or PIX (or, both). Thanks, Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
