I feel like an idiot now - this is how I have them licensed now! I don't know why I thought the Exchange Server would be any different as far as server licenses...
Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial 503-675-5510 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 13:53 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing Q On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, at 4:46pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Damn...of course it would have to make sense in Microsoft's favor. OTOH I > can't see it being smart to make a FSMO also an Exchange server and > file/print server. Oh well. Depends on the load, but, yes, splitting services over multiple computers is generally considered a Good Thing. But, typically, this is not such a big deal, as most people license as "per-seat". Give each workstation a Windows Server CAL. License all your servers as "per-seat" (and NOT "per-connection"). Then it does not matter if you have one server or twenty; the workstations each have a CAL. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=e nglish To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
