Hi,
if I understand correct, the current possibilities with NTFS-3G user mapping
are not symmetric.
Example 1:
Accounts
User (S)id
Group (S)id
Linux User1
1000
500
Linux User2 1001
500
Windows User1 xxx-1000 xxx-1000
Windows User2 xxx-1001 xxx-1001
This situation *can be mapped* with UserMapping file:
1000:500:xxx-1000
1001:500:xxx-1001
Example 2:
Accounts
User (S)id
Group (S)id
Windows User1
xxx-1000
xxx-513
Windows User2 xxx-1001
xxx-513
Linux User1
1000
1000
Linux User2 1001
1001
This situation *can _not_ be mapped* with UserMapping file posibilities.
Thanks for explaining or discussing this restriction,
Ulf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntfs-3g-devel mailing list
ntfs-3g-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
