Hi Jean-Pierre, In case you are wondering:
I am using data deduplication in Windows 2016 for my test environment iso: SW_DVD9_Win_Svr_STD_Core_and_DataCtr_Core_2016_64Bit_English_-2_MLF_X21-22843.ISO Kind regards, Jelle de Jong On 09/02/17 11:41, Jean-Pierre André wrote: > Hi, > > Jelle de Jong wrote: >> Hi Jean-Pierre, >> >> Thank you! >> >> The new plug-in seems to work for now, I am moving it into testing phase >> with-in our production back-up scripts. > > Please wait a few hours, I have found a bug which > I have fixed. I am currently inserting your data > into my test base in order to rerun all my tests. > >> Will you release the source code eventually, would like to write a blog >> post about how to add the support. > > What exactly do you mean ? If it is about how to > collect the data in a unsupported condition, it is > difficult, because unsupported generally means > unknown territory... > >> What do you think the changes are of the plug-in stop working again? > > (assuming a typo changes -> chances) > Your files were in a condition not met before : data > has been relocated according to a logic I do not fully > understand. Maybe this is an intermediate step in the > process of updating the files, anyway this can happen. > > The situation I am facing is that I have a single > example from which it is difficult to derive the rules. > So yes, the plugin may stop working again. > > Note : there are strict consistency checks in the plugin, > so it is unlikely you read invalid data. Moreover if > you only mount read-only you cannot damage the deduplicated > partition. > >> We do not have an automatic test running to verify the back-ups at this >> moment _yet_, so if the plug-in stops working, incremental file-based >> back-ups with empty files will slowly get in the back-ups this way :| > > Usually a deduplicated partition is only used for backups, > and reading from backups is only for recovering former > versions of files (on demand). > > If you access deduplicated files with no human control, > you have to insert your own checks in the process. I > would at least check whether the size of the recovered > file is the same as the deduplicated one (also grep for > messages in the syslog). > > Regards > > Jean-Pierre > >> Again thank you for all your help so far! >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jelle de Jong >> >> >> On 08/02/17 15:59, Jean-Pierre André wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Can you please make a try with : >>> http://jp-andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/dedup120-beta.zip >>> >>> This is experimental and based on assumptions which have >>> to be clarified, but it should work in your environment. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Jean-Pierre > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list ntfs-3g-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
