On 09 Oct 2001 11:51:09 +0200 relax-ng, schemata, DTD are in their simple forms all just syntactic permutations of the same semantic language. The types and subtypes make the language interesting for validation purposes, but not very much so for typesetting.
Anyway, parsing the internal subset and/or DTDs is not hard nor is it overly expensive in computing type, so I will probably add that to the parser as soon as I understand it's inner workings again. (I need the ENTITY's, not for xml inclusion but for image inclusion). "Berend de Boer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Hmm, XML schema's are way to difficult. Have you looked at RELAX NG? > > > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/ > > > > btw, for document definintions, i can imagine far more simple > > schema's, but i don't want to come up with yet another schema language > > -) > > True of course. For books DTDs are fine. But XML is used more and more > to exchange data. In such cases you want typing, subtyping, data > typing, and all those checks. That makes things a lot harder. -- groeten, Taco
