On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
[...]
> More important is to "rate" the questions:
>
> 1) is it a question to wich the answer can be found in the
> manual? Then there is already a documentation for it and we do
> not need to answer it again.
Heh. My question, about why my table content didn't lay out correctly,
was documented in the manual. Sure, it was my stupidity, but I managed
to miss the vital detail when reading.
The FAQ is an /alternate/ indexing system, as much as anything, for this
sort of question. :)
Daniel
--
As an adolescent I aspired to lasting fame, I craved factual certainty, and I
thirsted for a meaningful vision of human life -- so I became a scientist.
This is like becoming an archbishop so you can meet girls.
-- Matt Cartmill
