Hi, Marko Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > have you considered using Peter Miller's Aegis? Currently it seems > that many of the ConTeXt users would be capable of rephrasing their > bug report as a test for desired functionality. So this would open a > new way to contribute: by writing tests... Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that Aegis is more a CVS replacement than a bug tracking system. (http://aegis.sourceforge.net/) While I think a move to a CVS like (or based) system would be great, I think this independend of bugreports/feature request tracking. Additionally in order to make it work, we would require that Hans switches to such a system
> >From personal experience I can attest that Aegis is a great tool to > steer software development... A revision based system wouldn't be bad, that's true. The problem is that Hans version needs to be available in this system and frequently be updated. Otherwise it doesn't make that much a sense. Does someone know where the strength of these RCS lay? - CVS (http://www.cvshome.org/) - Subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) - arch (http://www.regexps.com/#arch) - aegis (http://aegis.sourceforge.net/) With warm regards, Tobias
