On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Hans Hagen wrote: > At 12:07 AM 2/28/2002 +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation!
Is the case of aegis, take it with a bit of a grain of salt. A couple of people have pointed out to me that I might be less aware of it's features than I thought. It's also the one I know the least about so your millage may vary. >> > - aegis (http://aegis.sourceforge.net/) >> >>Unless I am very much mistaken this is a development process tool that >>works with your choice of revision control system and imposes >>additional process on it. >> >>Last I checked it talked about RCS, CVS and SCCS, but may support >>more. >> >>This may be a solution to problems of greater scope than revision >>control, which may actually be the problem you are trying to address >>here, but it's not, in and of itself, a revision control system. > > Does anyone know perforce (commercial)? TeX live is done with it. I have heard good things about it but only very indirectly. It's commercial nature made it hard to verify experimentally as we didn't manage to secure a test license in the period I was looking. Daniel -- A cathedral, a wave of a storm, a dancer's leap, never turn out to be as high as we had hoped. -- Marcel Proust
