On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:57:35 +0100 "Frans Goddijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a quick question: Why isn't texexec.rme copied/renamed/edited to > > e.g. bin/win32/texexec.ini? In the default TeXLive distribution, > > texexec won't work -- for me at least -- because there is no > > texexec.ini file. But it seems that a default one could perhaps be > > distributed so that things work out of the box? Obviously, if there was an texexec.ini in the context zip file, it would overwrite an already present version. Considering that a lot of people install new context releases regularly, this does not sound like a good idea to me. I believe texexec uses the texexec.rme if it can't find the .ini file, but the supplied file is suitable for teTeX/fpTeX, not MikTeX. Correct, Hans? -- groeten, Taco
