At 10:12 AM 3/18/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:57:35 +0100 "Frans Goddijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Just a quick question: Why isn't texexec.rme copied/renamed/edited to
> > > e.g. bin/win32/texexec.ini? In the default TeXLive distribution,
> > > texexec won't work -- for me at least -- because there is no
> > > texexec.ini file. But it seems that a default one could perhaps be
> > > distributed so that things work out of the box?
>
>Obviously, if there was an texexec.ini in the context zip file, it would
>overwrite an already present version. Considering that a lot of people
>install new context releases regularly, this does not sound like a good
>idea to me.
>
>I believe texexec uses the texexec.rme if it can't find the .ini file,
>but the supplied file is suitable for teTeX/fpTeX, not MikTeX. Correct,
>Hans?
right, the copying is not really needed; miktex users must copy the file
and set the miktex flag.
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
fall-back web server:
www.pragma-ade.nl
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
