>>1. Why does this work? What is the difference between <Naskh> and <Naskh
>>sa 1>?
:
>so, sa 1 like definitions adapt themselves (and this is how for instance 
>getglyph in symbol defs can adapt itsef nicely)

So I think I understand this now:

Although <SomeFont> and <SomeFont sa 1> denote the same font and size, the body font 
size and magnifications like x, xx, small, and big are generated as functions of the 
scale factor. So if 
the scale factor like <sa 1> is not present, then the scaling does not get done, and 
so \tfx etc. and [myfont, 12pt] don't do any scaling. But \tfa, \tfb, etc still work 
because these are explicitly 
defined in terms of \magstep which will scale <SomeFont> even without the <sa 1>. 

Am I understanding this correctly? I will probably mention this in an upcoming font 
how-to.

Thnx again.

Best wishes
Idris

==========================
Dr. Idris Samawi Hamid
Depatment of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80526



Reply via email to