At 03:26 PM 6/3/2002 +0200, Kris Hermans wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I experimented a little further with installation of the urw fonts, still
>without results. I can only confirm the results of Ville Voipio.
>
>As it looks now, the ConTeXt + MikTeX combination seems pretty useless as
>far as fonts are concerned, and It would be great if someone could
>investigate the problems. I would be happy to help as much as I can and to
>contribute with testing.
>
>Is there anybody out there who has successfully installed third-party fonts
>with MikTeX and used them within ConTeXt?
>
>If these font problems persist to frustrate me, I'm forced to:
>
>- either switch to another TeX distribution on Windows, can somebody advise
>me a package that installs easily, WITH a variety of fonts? Open Source is
>preferred ...
>
>- or switch to another macro package (LaTeX), but I think this is a shame as
>I like the ConTeXt philosophy.

Does miktex come with the normal texmf (tex live) fonts? If so, doesn't

\setupencoding[default=ec]
\usetypescript [berry] [ec]

\setupbodyfont[pos,10pt]

some text in times

work?

Hans


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                       Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
                     documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to