On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > Monday, September 8, 2003 Bill McClain wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:43:26 +0200 > > Giuseppe Bilotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'd like to inform you on the current status and short-term > >> forecast for e-Omega.
Thanks to the e-Omega group for your work. I think this is a great step forward. > Uh ... not really, unless you need it for some very special > stuff. > > The only "general" advancement in Omega (and thus Aleph) which > is of "general" interest is the presence of more than 15 math > families, which can greatly reduce the programmer's onus in > supporting multiple symbol sets. This is not something for the > general user, though, unless some low-level programming for > this takes place first. (Hi there, Hans! ;>) In your announcement you mentioned: > containing most of the Omega enhancements (support for large > fonts, multiple directions and character coding manipulations > (OTPs/OCPs); the only unavailable feature is the support for I hope this brings TeX from the ASCII world into the Unicode world. Does this imply internal support for the various input encodings, such as utf-8? Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: scaprea.hobby.nl _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
