Hi Hans, Pablo,
> > But I do agree that the line ending handling seems a little odd. I find it > > surprising that the buffers internally use CR line endings since no systems > > in the past 20 years use that. > > how about tex ... > > \number\endlinechar > \number\numexpr`M-`A+1\relax % plain sets up `^^M Argh, how could I have forgotten about that. Yes, that makes complete sense. > > First, run "chcp 65001" before running "context" and record the size of the > > file written. Then, run "chcp 1251" and run "context" again. Hopefully the > > file size doesn't change; but if it does, then that means that the binary > > content of any file written will depend on the system's default code page, > > which would complicate making reproducible hashes. > > if that were the case nothing would work .. so it's bytes in - bytes out Ok good, that's what I was expecting. I've unfortunately used some programs that even fairly recently depended on the system code page, so I'm always a little cautious. > Hi Max, > > I realized later that I was doing something wrong. My fault here. Glad that you've figured it out. > I thought that ConTeXt would output the same character encoding as in > the source file when saving a buffer. Yes, Hans confirmed that that is correct. Thanks, -- Max ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
