On 13.04.2023 21:22, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:

> EB Garamond is hopelessly broken with respect to hlig and dlig, and has been 
> for quite a while. 
> I reported the problem 
> (https://github.com/octaviopardo/EBGaramond12/issues/20) over five years ago, 
> and the maintainer (if there is one) has done nothing. See also #4 in that 
> issues list (https://github.com/octaviopardo/EBGaramond12/issues/4). There 
> are a couple of forks, but there is no established reference implementation 
> that I can see. The Google Fonts implementation is similarly challenged, 
> perhaps worse.

Oh, I hadn't realized. I had read somewhere that the TeXlive version was
simply older than the `Specimen.pdf` document and had some bugs. I
hadn't realized that it wasn't fixed yet.
This is unfortunate! 

Thanks for the information, you saved me from wasting too much time on

Best regards, 

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : https://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to