Am 21.02.26 um 01:16 schrieb Jim:
Thank you for the message and for the interest in the *ANSS* .
Thanks for getting back!
Regarding the points raised:
*Editorial control and updates:* I have no problem with the
community updating and extending the work. I believe the best way to
ensure its continuity is to make it a collective project.
Great.
*Naming:* I agree that a slight change in the name (perhaps adding
'Community Edition' or similar) would be useful to avoid confusion
with the original versions.
Also, given that Mk IV has been superseded, I would suggest changing "Mark
IV" in the title to "LMTX". (And other places will need analogous updates.)
*Management:* I think it would be wise to have a small group of
coordinators to oversee the changes, although giving write access to
a selection of trusted contributors is a great way to keep the
project dynamic.
This might be one of the trickier parts to getting things going.
I am excited to see how the community takes this project forward.
Me too!
Everyone:
---------
Speaking of "management", who "owns" the github contextgarden user?
Taco?
This would be a good time to move to Codeberg
(https://codeberg.org/contextgarden); it wouldn’t even need to be under
the contextgarden account.
Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
