Am 17.08.26 um 06:31 schrieb Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context:
I use specifications such as APA or Chicago myself, and I think they are
very good tools for ordinary bibliographic work. But I would still
encourage you, when you have the opportunity, to experiment with |
context-sbl|.
SBL see https://github.com/jjmccollum/context-sbl
Wouldn’t it make sense to include the SBL style in the distribution?
If not: Could the author (or maintainer) please restructure the
repository so that we can make it installable as a module?
(Of course we could fork and change it accordingly. I don’t really want
to do it myself, since I never needed a proper bibliography.)
Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
