Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > > context : ver: 2005.01.31 > > cont-en : ver: 2005.01.31 fmt: 2006.3.28 mes: english > > > > Maybe this context installation is too old for nocheck. On the other > > hand, it should complain then? > > > i remember a bug (actually the mechanism is rather old, so the bug > must have been a temp one)
I tried it on context live (2006.04.04), and it works as hoped (figure 2 is the on on top of the page with numbering=nocheck, otherwise it's numbered in page order). Definitely I need to do an upgrade. But I noticed another problem: The context-live pdf is black/white, whereas on my system the figures come out in color. I could reproduce the difference with the following: $ texexec --pdf 3 => 3.pdf is B/W versus $ texexec 3.tex $ dvips 3 $ ps2pdf 3.ps => 3.pdf is in color texexec --color makes the two pathways give identical pdf files, but shouldn't they also be identical (and B/W) without the --color? Or is that too much of a mess, to inquire into what colors the metapost (or other EPS) figures are doing. -Sanjoy `A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.' - Bertrand de Jouvenal _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
