Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > thanks for looking into this. I had realized something was fishy with > the ConTeXt converted patterns, so I'd be extremely grateful if we > could have a corrected version. Hans: do we need the actual > conversion rules, or would it be enough if Peter or I included the > i prefer the rules, so if you can sort that out with peter > actual patterns into lang-agr.hyp? That may be faster and less work > for you. >
since there is no infrastructure for patterns, and since i want to independent of anything happening in that area (keep in mind that we've been bitten by that too often: renaming, disappearing, funny internals, latex specific, limited encodings, etc) it's easier for me to occasionally run ctxtools on the originals and maintain that than to keep track of files Hans _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
