Am 2007-05-10 um 15:44 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer: > * The version of the Lilypond module on CTAN isn't actually that new > since it dates back to September 2005 (according to the date of > t-lilypond.pdf). Now even without that date, we can spot it in the > code > since it mentions the version of Lilypond it was typed for (this is a > general request in Lilypond); in that case it's 2.6; so Hraban meant > your code was old, not your executable (current version is 2.10).
I meant both ;-) I didn't even knew there was a version of t-lilypond on CTAN (overlooked that in Steffen's post). (It's a known problem that ConTeXt versions on CTAN are often outdated, too.) I should update the contextgarden version, but I wanted to wait if Aditya could find the error with Ruby texexec and clean up the code a bit. > In any case, just take the example from the file Hraban just posted > and it should solve both problems (it does here). And Hraban should > probably add a \version statement to his sample code ;-) I was tired of the version statements in every snippet, so I let the module add a version statement. It's impossible to take care of different LilyPond versions in one module, so I always try to stick with (and change syntax for) the latest - "always" meaning "everytime I work at a songbook". LilyPond is a rather fast moving target, like ConTeXt, so some code becomes old very soon... Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
