Arthur Reutenauer schrieb: >> luac5.1.exe [TO] luac.exe >> etc. > > Alternatively, you can use LuaTeX itself as the lua interpreter and > compiler. That is, the same binary will act as: > > LuaTeX proper when called luatex(.exe) > lua when called texlua(.exe) (equivalent to luatex --luaonly) > luac, the compiler, when called texluac.(exe) > > So you don't even need lua anymore.
i see. but on windows you waste more than 7mb disk space this way. installing the lua binaries costs only 288kb. so where is the benefit? there must be a better way. peter > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
