Maurício wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > just wondering: how many ConTeXt-ers depend on ligatures such as:
> > '' (double quote) and '' (two single quotes) -> right double quote
> > `` -> left double quote
> > ,, -> DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
> > (...)
>
> You got replies from experienced users, so I
> thought you could use an answer from a
> begginer; there are many of us out there!
>
> Really, all of those are problems to me, even
> -- and ---. If you have ligatures at all, you
> have to take some (a lot) of time to learn
> how they work, and which ones are available,
> and how to avoid them when you need.
>
> I would really like if we could replace
> ligatures for a nice page, linked from the
> "first steps" documentation, explaining the
> most interesting Unicode characters and when
> to use them properly. I've just read about
> U+2010–2015 in wikipedia pages about hyphens
> and dashes, and I wish I were directed to
> those pages instead of everything I've read
> about ligatures so far.
>
> I'm not a professional user of Context, so of
> course you'll take that into account as you
> consider what I say.
actually, what is called ligatures here, are no ligatures in the real
sense; they are tricks that use the tex ligature mechanism to achieve
something (the fi ligature came out of f + i written in sequence but
nobody in the past ever wrore, by pen, three -'s separated by a small
space in a row, it's was just a longer rule)
by adding a hyphen+hyphen=endash and endash+hyphen=emdash rule in the
(first) characters ligature table in the tfm file, one could save typing
this solution is a very english-language oriented one, because in quite
some languages --- happens less often than characters with accents or
whateve; i wonder what would have happened if tex had initially been
written for another language because if the tfm file could have dealt
with > 256 characters "u -> uumlaut would have made sense as pseudo
ligature too ...
sometimes it's even hard to get rid of such pseudo ligs ... in documents
coded in xml, --- really is --- and it' snear to impossible in
traditional tex to selectively get rid of it ...
so, apart from remapping the weird single quote and the en/emdashes (too
many docs around) is no real reason for the other ones ...
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
