> wel, we can make a characters.context.descriptions but i'm not sure if > it will really be used, because when one knows this rather verbose > string (has looked it up), one could as well use the (also found) > unicode directly
That's what I thought at first, but then I realized it could be useful for characters with diacritics, whose names are much more predictable in general (at least for some diacritic marks). And then you could add named sequences (http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamedSequences.txt) which are a couple of additional names for some specific *sequences* of Unicode characters. Arthur ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
